“Shambolic”: experts explain the consequences of cutting tax-free pension cash
Rumours have been swirling that the Chancellor might be considering a cut to the tax-free lump sum allowance on pensions in the upcoming Budget. If such a measure were implemented, it could have far-reaching consequences, not only reducing the immediate tax-free benefits for retirees but also increasing their tax burden over the course of their retirement.
A shift of this nature would likely cost individuals tens of thousands of pounds, depending on the size of their pension pots and the rate of taxation. In response to these rumours, financial analysts have been modelling different scenarios to demonstrate the potential impact.
Patricia McGirr, Founder of Repossession Rescue Network says such cuts are a “shambolic” idea.
She continues, arguing, “Totally without merit. People who save and invest wisely to create a secure retirement must be free to use their capital as they choose at a time when they’re ready to enjoy the fruits of their labours. Those reliant on using this cash windfall to pay off a remaining mortgage or other debts to reduce their outgoings will feel this most. This is just another raid on those of pensionable age. Poor form. Poorer economics.”
Such cuts to tax-free pension cash could have generational impacts. Gabriel McKeown, Head of Macroeconomics at Sad Rabbit Investments sees Chancellor Reeves’ latest “pension pot pinch threatens to tarnish retirement prospects for an entire generation. With Labour’s commitment not to raise income tax, NI, or VAT, pensions are once again in the crosshairs, with a change that could reduce the appeal of pensions altogether.”
Mortgage-free retirements could be affected
“The repercussions of this policy shift could ripple through the mortgage sector, as with less tax-free cash available, retirees may be forced to extend their mortgages considerably,” says McKeown.
He says if fewer retirees can afford to downsize, this could directly impact housing market liquidity and put further pressure on property prices.
“The uncertainty surrounding these changes is already causing anxiety among savers,” he says, “with the potential for a sudden withdrawal rush to cause a selling crisis in pension assets, driving down valuations in the short-term.”
Consequently, the coming weeks may determine whether the dream of a mortgage-free retirement remains within reach for Britain’s future pensioners.”
What’s at risk?
Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, expressed her concern over these rumoured changes. “The Chancellor may have said rumoured changes are designed to hit ‘those with the broadest shoulders,’ but changes to the tax-free lump sum would do irreparable damage to the pension system. This risks undermining confidence and impacting people’s retirement savings.”
Morrissey argues that maintaining the current structure is crucial for encouraging people to save for their retirement. “We would strongly advocate for pension tax-free cash to be kept as sacrosanct in the system. People need confidence to save for the future or they will simply not have the kind of spending levels that they require to maintain their lifestyle in retirement,” she warns.
The ripple effect of such a change could go beyond individual households. “This will not only prove challenging for households individually, but the collective impact will also be a weakening of the economy as a whole,” Morrissey adds.
Will cuts really target “those with the broadest shoulders”?
At first glance, reducing the tax-free lump sum may seem like a policy aimed at the wealthiest savers. However, the reality is more complex. Morrissey explains that even those with relatively modest pension pots could be significantly affected.
For example, a £400,000 pension pot purchasing an annuity would generate an annual income of about £20,000 at age 67—just over half the UK median average wage of £34,953, according to ONS data. Even after adding the full state pension, reaching the median income would require a pension pot of £469,000, hardly a lavish sum. Morrissey stresses that this demonstrates how such changes will hit people who may have sufficient funds to meet their retirement needs but are far from wealthy.
Three scenarios: what the impact could be
To further understand the consequences, Morrissey outlines three potential scenarios based on different tax-free lump sum reductions, showing the immediate financial burden these cuts could impose:
Scenario 1: Tax-Free Lump Sum Reduced to £225,000
If the tax-free lump sum were reduced to £225,000 (with protection for existing accrual), those with pension pots of £900,000 or more (aged 57 or older on or after April 6, 2024) could face a significant tax bill.
A basic rate taxpayer would face an additional tax bill of £8,655, while a higher rate taxpayer could owe £17,310 in tax on the excess.
Scenario 2: Tax-Free Lump Sum Reduced to £150,000
If the lump sum was cut to £150,000, the tax implications become more severe. For individuals with pension pots of £600,000 or more (with no protection), the tax due on the excess amount could be as high as:
- £23,655 for basic rate taxpayers
- £47,310 for higher-rate taxpayers
Scenario 3: Tax-Free Lump Sum Reduced to £100,000
The most extreme scenario—cutting the tax-free lump sum to £100,000—would be devastating for those nearing retirement with £400,000 or more saved.
A basic rate taxpayer would face a tax bill of £33,655, while a higher rate taxpayer would owe a staggering £67,310.
Protecting Your Future
For freelancers and the self-employed, this news is especially troubling, as many rely heavily on their personal pension savings to maintain financial independence in retirement. Planning ahead, understanding potential policy changes, and seeking expert advice will be essential in navigating this uncertain landscape.
While these scenarios illustrate worst-case outcomes, they highlight the importance of staying informed and taking action to protect your pension. Ensuring your contributions are maximised before any potential changes can safeguard a larger portion of your savings.